Rosado-Sanchez v. Kalanick et al
| Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez |
| Travis Kalanick, Garret Camp and Dara Khosroshahi |
| 3:2022cv01500 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Silvia L Carreno-Coll |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Garret Camp, Travis Kalanick, Dara Khosroshahi through the US Marshals with copy of Order, copy of Complaint and USM 285 (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 USM 285) (ad) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Finding as moot #5 Motion Requesting Order. The Court has granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. See Docket No. 6. Signed by Judge Silvia L. Carreno-Coll on 11/15/2022. (MRB)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Silvia L. Carreno-Coll on 11/15/2022. (MRB)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION requesting Order of Relief Due to Harassment from Uber Eats filed by Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez, pro se. Responses due by 11/14/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(ecc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT: The Clerk's Office has received your Complaint. A new case has been opened and assigned to Judge Silvia Carreno-Coll. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerk's Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and dark enough for scanning. The Court enforces its rules and expects compliance with all directives; failure to comply with a court rule, federal law, or court directive may result in dismissal. The plaintiff must also keep the Court informed of any address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned undelivered, the case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (ecc) |
| Filing 3 ***FILED IN ERROR Filed in wrong entry.*** MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to Garret Camp, Travis Kalanick, Dara Khosroshahi filed by Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez, pro se. Responses due by 10/31/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (ecc) Modified on 10/18/2022 - Summons included in DE #1 as attachment to complaint. (ecc). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Garret Camp, Travis Kalanick, Dara Khosroshahi, filed by Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez, pro se. Service due by 1/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Supporting Docs to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Sheet)(ecc) Modified on 10/18/2022 to include Summons as attachments (ecc). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2022: #4 Summons) (ecc). |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez, pro se. Responses due by 10/31/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 in Support of Application)(ecc) Modified on 10/18/2022 to modify DE title(ecc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
