Municipality of Aguadilla v. Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. et al
| Municipality of Aguadilla |
| Allergan PLC, Allergan Finance, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Actavis PLC, Actavis, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis, LLC, WATSON PHARMA, INC., Anda, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Walgreens Co., Wal-Mart, Inc. and Other Corporations ABC and 1-100 |
| 3:2022cv01533 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number APRDC-7986068.), filed by Municipality of Aguadilla. Service due by 2/8/2023, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet Category Sheet, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Summons Summons, #5 Summons Summons, #6 Summons Summons, #7 Summons Summons, #8 Summons Summons, #9 Summons Summons, #10 Summons Summons, #11 Summons Summons, #12 Summons Summons, #13 Summons Summons, #14 Summons Summons, #15 Summons Summons)(Sanders, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
