Rodriguez Acevedo v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Edgardo Rodriguez Acevedo |
DHL Express (USA), Inc. and DHL Express USA, Inc. |
3:2022cv01539 |
November 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Francisco A Besosa |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Javier G. Vazquez-Segarra on behalf of Defendant DHL Express USA, Inc..(Vazquez-Segarra, Javier) |
Filing 11 ORDER re #10 Motion Submitting Certified Translations of Exhibits to Notice of Removal: NOTED. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 11/23/2022. (brc) |
Filing 10 MOTION Submitting Certified Translations of Exhibits to Notice of Removal filed by Lourdes C. Hernandez-Venegas on behalf of DHL Express USA, Inc. Responses due by 12/6/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, #2 Exhibit B - Authorization to Conduct Business in PR)(Hernandez-Venegas, Lourdes) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Javier G. Vazquez-Segarra on behalf of DHL Express USA, Inc. (Vazquez-Segarra, Javier) |
Filing 8 ORDER re #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File: GRANTED. Certified translation of the complaint due November 29, 2022. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 11/15/2022. (brc) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: GRANTED. Answer deadline is extended until December 14, 2022. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 11/15/2022. (brc) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #2 Motion Submitting Documents: NOTED. Signed by Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 11/15/2022. (brc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Senior Judge Francisco A. Besosa (arg) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time until November 29, 2022 to file Certified Translations filed by Lourdes C. Hernandez-Venegas on behalf of DHL Express (USA), Inc. Responses due by 11/28/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Hernandez-Venegas, Lourdes) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time until December 14, 2022 to File Answer to the Complaint or Otherwise Plead filed by Lourdes C. Hernandez-Venegas on behalf of DHL Express (USA), Inc. Responses due by 11/28/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Hernandez-Venegas, Lourdes) |
Filing 2 MOTION Submitting Civil Cover Sheets, Category Sheet and Attorney Appearance Forms re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by DHL Express (USA), Inc. filed by Lourdes C. Hernandez-Venegas on behalf of DHL Express (USA), Inc. Responses due by 11/28/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Attorney Appearance LCH, #4 Attorney Appearance JVS)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Hernandez-Venegas, Lourdes) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, Carolina Superior Part, case number CA2022CV02935. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APRDC-7988815), filed by DHL Express (USA), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, #2 Exhibit B - Authorization to Conduct Business in PR, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration and Articles of Incorporation)(Hernandez-Venegas, Lourdes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.