Ortiz-Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sheila M Ortiz-Torres |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv01603 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Marshal D Morgan |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Granted #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Marshal D. Morgan. (GDM)
|
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: By Order of Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon (Docket No. 7), this case has been randomly assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Marshal D. Morgan for all further proceedings, including the entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c). All future pleadings shall bear only the initials of the Magistrate Judge next to the case number: Civil Case No. 22-1603 (MDM). Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon is no longer assigned to this case. Signed by Clerk on 12/06/2022. (ft) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE. The Commissioner of Social Security has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge in all cases involving judicial review of a final order denying disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Pursuant to Plaintiff's Consent, this case is hereby referred to a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) for all further proceedings, including entry of judgment. Signed by Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon on 12/6/2022.(wm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Aida M. Delgado-Colon (arg) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Sheila M Ortiz-Torres. (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Luis Rafael Perez-Morales on behalf of Sheila M Ortiz-Torres (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
| Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Sheila M Ortiz-Torres. (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Perez-Morales, Luis) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Luis Rafael Perez-Morales on behalf of Sheila M Ortiz-Torres Responses due by 12/19/2022. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
| Filing 1 **SELECTED PARTY** FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Sheila M Ortiz-Torres. (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz-Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sheila M Ortiz-Torres | |
| Represented By: | Luis Rafael Perez-Morales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
