Ramos-Troche v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Margarita Ramos-Troche |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT |
| SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2023cv01028 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT of proceedings before BHA, with notice of filing thereof filed by Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT. Plaintiff's Social Security Brief due by 4/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records)(Boudreau, Nicole)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL PRO BONO Counsel Pedro G. Cruz-Sanchez appointed to represent Plaintiff Margarita Ramos-Troche, re 16 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Clerk on 3/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice in Spanish). (mg) Manual Notification sent via regular mail to Plaintiff re: ECF No. 16 & #17 ORDER and ECF No. 17 mailed to Counsel. Modified on 3/15/2023 to add text as to manual notification. (mg).
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Nannette Marie Godreau-Vazquez withdrawn from the case. The Clerk of the Court will appoint substitute pro-bono counsel with experience in social security cases. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 3/14/2023. (mrr)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Nannette Marie Godreau-Vazquez filed by Nannette Marie Godreau-Vazquez on behalf of Margarita Ramos-Troche Responses due by 3/27/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Godreau-Vazquez, Nannette)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appointment of Counsel Nannette Marie Godreau-Vazquez to represent Margarita Ramos-Troche, re 13 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Clerk on 2/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appointment in Spanish Language)(rim)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Withdraw. Attorney Carlos A. Ortiz-Morales withdrawn from the case. The Clerk of the Court shall appoint substitute counsel with experience in social security cases. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 2/15/2023. (mrr)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Carlos A. Ortiz-Morales filed by Carlos A. Ortiz-Morales on behalf of Margarita Ramos-Troche Responses due by 2/27/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Ortiz-Morales, Carlos)
|
|
Filing 10
Mail sent to Carlos A. Ortiz-Morales was returned as undeliverable. Notice of Manual notification sent via regular mail to new address. (rim)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole J. Boudreau on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Boudreau, Nicole)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court reminds the parties that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C.A. 636(c). The Social Security Administration has consented to have all social security cases brought before a Magistrate Judge. This procedure could prove to be more expeditious, and therefore, less expensive, than a trial before a District Judge. The Plaintiff is, of course, also free "to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences." Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2). The Plaintiff is advised, however, that the increase in the Court's criminal docket may impede a reasonably timely disposition of this case. Hence, The Court hereby orders the Plaintiff to affirmatively state whether or not she consents to having the instant matter be entertained before a U.S. Magistrate Judge through the entry of judgment and his rationale underlying his decision on or before February 14, 2023 . Failure to respond to this Order will be treated as an implied consent by the Plaintiff. The Court notes that the Magistrate Judges in the District of Puerto Rico are first-rate jurists with impeccable legal minds, integrity and judicial temperament. The Plaintiff should thus carefully consider the merits of consenting to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 1/31/2023. (mrr)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appointment of Counsel Carlos A. Ortiz-Morales to represent Margarita Ramos-Troche, re 6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Clerk on 1/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appointment in Spanish Language) (rim)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk of the Court will appoint pro-bono counsel with experience in social security cases. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 1/25/2023. (nat)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 1/25/2023. (nat)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk for the District of Puerto Rico has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management Electronic/Case Filing (CM/ECF) System, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Puerto Rico. No summons shall issue. Social Security Answer due by 3/24/2023. (rim)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT: The Clerk's Office has received your Social Security Complaint. A new case has been opened and assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerk's Office concerning your case must include the case number: 3:23-cv-01028-RAM. All documents for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and dark enough for scanning. The Court enforces its rules and expects compliance with all directives; failure to comply with a court rule, federal law, or court directive may result in dismissal. The plaintiff must also keep the Court informed of any address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned undelivered, the case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (rim)
|
|
Filing 3
***SELECTED PARTIES*** MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Margarita Ramos-Troche, pro se. Responses due by 2/6/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Financial Affidavit, #2 Supplement)(rim)
|
|
Filing 2
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Margarita Ramos-Troche, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Sheet)(rim)
|
|
Filing 1
***SELECTED PARTIES***APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Margarita Ramos-Troche, pro se. Responses due by 2/6/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (rim)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
