USA v. $51,800.00 in United States Currency
| USA |
| $51,800.00 IN UNIITED STATES CURRENCY and $51,800.00 in United States Currency |
| 3:2023cv01093 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Warrant of Arrest in Rem Issued as to $51,800.00 in United States Currency. (Attachments: #1 Warrant of Arrest in Rem) (ad) Modified docket text title on 3/6/2023 (rim). |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Issuance of Warrant in rem. Signed by Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach on 3/3/2023. (mrr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach (arg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem and Seizure filed by Carlos Jose Romo-Aledo on behalf of USA Responses due by 3/14/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Romo-Aledo, Carlos) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $51,800.00 IN UNIITED STATES CURRENCY, filed by USA. Service due by 5/30/2023, (Attachments: #1 Unsworn Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Sheet)(Romo-Aledo, Carlos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
