Rosado-Sanchez v. Claro Puerto Rico et al
Plaintiff: Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez
Defendant: Claro Puerto Rico and Enrique Ortiz-De Montellano
Case Number: 3:2023cv01199
Filed: April 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Presiding Judge: Silvia L Carreno-Coll
Referring Judge: Pedro A Delgado-Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: Pursuant to the #4 Order of Recusal entered by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez, this case has been randomly reassigned within the Case Assignment System to the docket of Judge Silvia Carreno-Coll. Signed by Clerk on 05/02/2023. (ft)
May 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL: See attached. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 5/2/2023. (FAR)
April 27, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT: The Clerk's Office has received your Complaint. A new case has been opened and assigned to Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerk's Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and dark enough for scanning. The Court enforces its rules and expects compliance with all directives; failure to comply with a court rule, federal law, or court directive may result in dismissal. The plaintiff must also keep the Court informed of any address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned undelivered, the case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Sent by mail to Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez) (mcm)
April 26, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Claro Puerto Rico, Enrique Ortiz-De Montellano, filed by Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez, Pro Se. Service due by 7/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Exhibits) (mcm)
April 26, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez, Pro Se. Responses due by 5/10/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (mcm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosado-Sanchez v. Claro Puerto Rico et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pablo E. Rosado-Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Claro Puerto Rico
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enrique Ortiz-De Montellano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?