Monet-Moyano v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Linnette F Monet-Moyano |
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT |
SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
3:2023cv01312 |
June 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Marcos E Lopez |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT of proceedings before BHA, with notice of filing thereof filed by Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT. Plaintiff's Social Security Brief due by 9/8/2023. (Boudreau, Nicole) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole J. Boudreau on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT (Boudreau, Nicole) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: By Order of Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro (Docket No. 9), this case has been randomly assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez for all further proceedings and including the entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). All future pleadings shall bear only the initials of the Magistrate Judge next to the case number: Civil Case No. 23-1312 (MEL). Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro is no longer assigned to this case. Signed by Clerk on 06/15/2023. (ft) |
Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: The Commissioner of Social Security has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge in all cases involving judicial review of a final order denying disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Upon the plaintiff's consent filed at ECF No. #5 , the case is referred to a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings, including entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Signed by Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro on 6/14/2023. (mig) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro on 6/14/2023. (GMN) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case has been assigned to Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro. (vdm) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk for the District of Puerto Rico has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management Electronic/Case Filing (CM/ECF) System, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Puerto Rico. No summons shall issue. Social Security Answer due by 8/14/2023. (mg) |
Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Linnette F Monet-Moyano. (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Luis Rafael Perez-Morales on behalf of Linnette F Monet-Moyano (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT, filed by Linnette F Monet-Moyano. (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Perez-Morales, Luis) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Luis Rafael Perez-Morales on behalf of Linnette F Monet-Moyano Responses due by 6/27/2023. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
Filing 1 **SELECTED PARTY** FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Linnette F Monet-Moyano. (Perez-Morales, Luis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.