Gilberto v. United States Government et al
| Velez Gilberto and Gilberto Velez |
| US Government, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, DOE JANE, United States Government and Jane Doe |
| 3:2024cv01047 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Camille L Velez-Rive |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to United States Government. Note: Counsel must print all summonses and follow the service requirements set forth by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Electronic issuance of summonses should not be construed as authorizing electronic service. (ad) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Issuance of Summons. SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED. Signed by Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive on 03/05/2024. (CVR)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to United States Government filed by Jose Agustin Arce-Diaz on behalf of Gilberto Velez Responses due by 3/19/2024. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Summons summons to be issued, #2 Summons summons to be issued)(Arce-Diaz, Jose) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Note: Counsel must print all summonses and follow the service requirements set forth by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Electronic issuance of summonses should not be construed as authorizing electronic service. (rim) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Second MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Signed by Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive on 2/21/2024. (ari)
|
| Filing 7 Second MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas filed by Jose Agustin Arce-Diaz on behalf of Gilberto Velez Responses due by 3/5/2024. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Summons summons to be issued)(Arce-Diaz, Jose) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, United States Government. Note: Counsel must print all summonses and follow the service requirements set forth by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Electronic issuance of summonses should not be construed as authorizing electronic service. (vrg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER noted #4 MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, United States Government. Signed by Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive on 2/15/2024. (ari)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, United States Government filed by Jose Agustin Arce-Diaz on behalf of Gilberto Velez Responses due by 2/28/2024. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Summons Summons US Attorney District of PR, #3 Summons Summons US Attorney General)(Arce-Diaz, Jose) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. Plaintiff is granted until 2/24/2024 to submit the summonses in this case for them to be issued by the Clerk's Office. Signed by Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive on 02/12/2024. (CVR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case has been assigned to Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive. (vrg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405 receipt number APRDC-8535740.), filed by Velez Gilberto. Service due by 4/30/2024, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet category sheet)(Arce-Diaz, Jose) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
