Falwell et al v. Hogan et al
Glenda Falwell and Kevin Falwell |
ER M.D. Nicholas J. Hogan, Loudoun County Sheriff Department, Loudoun County Mental Health Department, Deputy M. Sperling, Officer Holmes, INOVA Hospital, MH Clinician Kelly Maio, Officer B. Nolan, INOVA Health Systems Foundation, Sheriff Michael L. Chapman, Nurse Emily Mayer and Deputy S. Mercantel |
3:2024cv01392 |
August 30, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Raul M Arias-Marxuach |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 Mail sent to Yosu D. Amorrortu-Pagan was returned as undeliverable. (rim) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appointment of Counsel Yosu D. Amorrortu-Pagan to represent Glenda Falwell and Kevin Falwell, in re 6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appointment in Spanish Language)(rim) (Notice sent via regular mail.) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Michael L. Chapman, Nicholas J. Hogan, Holmes, INOVA Hospital, Loudoun County Mental Health Department, Loudoun County Sheriff Department, Kelly Maio, Emily Mayer, S. Mercantel, B. Nolan, M. Sperling. Note: Counsel must print all summonses and follow the service requirements set forth by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Electronic issuance of summonses should not be construed as authorizing electronic service. (ad) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits Summons in a Civil Action re #1 Complaint filed by Glenda Falwell, pro se. (rim) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Glenda Falwell and Kevin Falwell, pro se. Responses due by 9/17/2024. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: ***SELECTED PARTIES*** #1 Affidavit in Support)(rim) Modified to add filer on 9/4/2024 (rim). |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT: The Clerk's Office has received your Complaint. A new case has been opened and assigned to Judge Raul M. Arias-Marxuach. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerk's Office concerning your case must include the case number: 3:24-cv-01392-RAM. All documents for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and dark enough for scanning. The Court enforces its rules and expects compliance with all directives; failure to comply with a court rule, federal law, or court directive may result in dismissal. The plaintiff must also keep the Court informed of any address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned undelivered, the case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Copy of this notice, Standing Order No. 10 - Consent by Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing in Civil Cases and Consent Form sent to Pro Se by mail.) (rim) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Glenda Falwell and Kevin Falwell, pro se. Service due by 11/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(rim) Modified to add filer on 9/4/2024 (rim). |
Filing Fee Received $ 405.00, receipt number 113082. (rim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.