Soto-Mendez v. Swaney
Petitioner: Manuel Soto-Mendez
Respondent: Warden G. Swaney
Case Number: 3:2024cv01451
Filed: September 24, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Presiding Judge: Camille L Velez-Rive
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT: The Clerk's Office has received your Complaint. A new case has been opened and assigned to Judge Camille L. Velez-Rive. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerk's Office concerning your case must include the case number (24-cv-1451-CVR). All documents for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and dark enough for scanning. The Court enforces its rules and expects compliance with all directives; failure to comply with a court rule, federal law, or court directive may result in dismissal. The plaintiff must also keep the Court informed of any address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned undelivered, the case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Copy of this notice sent to Pro Se by mail.) (mcm)
September 26, 2024 Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. Plaintiff did not pay the corresponding filing fee which is $5.00 for Habeas Corpus Complaints under 28 U.S.C. 2241, nor filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffs request to proceed without prepayment of fees does not comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915 and L.Civ. Rs. 3.1 (a), (b)(2) and (c)(4). Plaintiff did not submit Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff did not submit an Affidavit in Support of Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The Prisoner did not attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer, showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in his/her institutional account. The pleading cannot be signed by multiple plaintiffs as the have individual cases and must file separate motions. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 10/28/2024. (Notification sent to Manuel Soto-Mendez by mail with Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis' form). (mcm)
September 24, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Warden G. Swaney, filed by Manuel Soto-Mendez, Pro Se. Service due by 12/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mcm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/26/2024: #2*Restricted* PSLC Transmittal Memo) (mcm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soto-Mendez v. Swaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden G. Swaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Manuel Soto-Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?