Tucker v. Olsen et al
| Billy Shane Tucker |
| Bob Olsen, Warden McCall, Mr Claytor, LT Williams, Major Bush, Mr Najar and Ms Cocciolone |
| 0:2009cv03180 |
| December 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Anderson |
| Patrick Michael Duffy |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 64 Report and Recommendations, granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Major Bush, LT Williams, Warden McCall, Mr Claytor, Bob Olsen, denying 39 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Billy Shane Tucker, denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Billy Shane Tucker. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 1/19/2011. (jpet, )
|
|
Filing
64
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted, re 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Major Bush, LT Williams, Warden McCall, Mr Claytor, Bob Olsen, and that Tucker's motions be denied, re 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Billy Shane Tucker and 39 MOTION for Default Judgment as to all defendants filed by Billy Shane Tucker. Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 10/19/2010. (jpet, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
