Bolt v. Doe 1 et al
| C Allen Bolt |
| John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, Jane Doe Garrison, John Doe 5 and Jane Doe 2 |
| 0:2010cv01374 |
| May 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Greenville |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS accepting 37 Report and Recommendations, dismissing case with prejudice for lack of prosecution and terminating any outstanding motions, re 28 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by Jane Doe 2, Scott Bodiford, James Dorriety, Jane Doe Garrison, John Doe 2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 1, John Doe 3. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 5/4/2011. (jpet, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER that the plaintiff shall advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this orde r, re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jane Doe 2, Scott Bodiford, James Dorriety, Jane Doe Garrison, John Doe 2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 1, John Doe 3, ( Response to Motion due by 2/15/2011). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 1/28/2011. (jpet, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
