Mays v. Jefferson et al
LeBryson Mays |
Bernadette Jefferson and Aubrey Rennick |
0:2010cv02284 |
September 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Rock Hill Office |
Kershaw |
Paige J Gossett |
Terry L Wooten |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS accepting 50 Report and Recommendations, dismissing action with prejudice for lack of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; terminating any pending motions, re 28 Motion for TRO filed by LeBryson Mays, 29 Motion to Compel filed by LeBryson Mays, and 41 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Bernadette Jefferson. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 7/11/2011. (jpet, ) |
Filing 47 ORDER the plaintiff shall advise the court as to whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendants motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. ( Response due by 5/25/2011.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on May 11, 2011. (cwil, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER directing Clerk of Court to set up a separate civil action for the plaintiff's claims against Aubrey Rennick. Aubrey Rennick terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 9/23/2010. (jpet, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.