El-Bey v. Clover Police Department et al
| Miy'at Kali El-Bey |
| Clover Police Department, M L Wilson, Herman Melvin Howell, A+ Garage & Towing, David Woods and J Corsey Bentley |
| 0:2013cv00438 |
| February 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| York |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
OPINION and ORDER denying 80 Motion for a Final Order. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 2/28/2014.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION and ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 69 Report and Recommendation, granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 53 Motion for Judicial Notice, granting 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 1/8/2014. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER affirming 23 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 7/2/2013. (jpet, )
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 16 Report and Recommendation, dismissing Defendant Herman Melvin Howell (Judge) from this matter without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 6/18/2013. (jpet, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
