Massi v. Walgreen Co

Massi v. Walgreen Co

Plaintiff:	Clay Massi
Defendant:	Walgreen Co
Case Number:	0:2013cv00538
Filed:	March 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Rock Hill Office
County:	York
Presiding Judge:	Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge:	Paige J Gossett
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2013	Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER finding as moot 69 Motion for Judgment or Order Docket Number 62 Motion for Relief from Judgment; finding as moot 70 Motion of Notice; finding as moot 72 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/1/2013.(cbru, )
September 26, 2013	Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 59 Report and Recommendation; granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing 22 Motion to Supplement re 20 Response in Opposition to Motion; dismissing 25 Motion to Correct the Record; dismissing 30 Motion for Leave to File; dismissing 35 Motion for Judicial Notice; dismissing 43 Motion to Allow Plaintiff to File Proof of Walgreens Fraud; dismissing 44 Motion for Judicial Notice; dismissin g 49 Motion for Leave to Inform this Court of Fraudulant Materials on the Docket; denying 62 Motion for Relief from Judgment FRCP Rule 60(b)(3) Fraud on the Court; dismissing 63 Motion for Writ of Mandamus; granting 65 Motion to Strike. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 9/25/2013. (cbru, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2013

Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER finding as moot 69 Motion for Judgment or Order Docket Number 62 Motion for Relief from Judgment; finding as moot 70 Motion of Notice; finding as moot 72 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/1/2013.(cbru, )

September 26, 2013

Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 59 Report and Recommendation; granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing 22 Motion to Supplement re 20 Response in Opposition to Motion; dismissing 25 Motion to Correct the Record; dismissing 30 Motion for Leave to File; dismissing 35 Motion for Judicial Notice; dismissing 43 Motion to Allow Plaintiff to File Proof of Walgreens Fraud; dismissing 44 Motion for Judicial Notice; dismissin g 49 Motion for Leave to Inform this Court of Fraudulant Materials on the Docket; denying 62 Motion for Relief from Judgment FRCP Rule 60(b)(3) Fraud on the Court; dismissing 63 Motion for Writ of Mandamus; granting 65 Motion to Strike. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 9/25/2013. (cbru, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Massi v. Walgreen Co
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co
Represented By:	E Raymond Moore, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clay Massi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?