Mann v. Byars et al
Anthony L Mann |
All Members of the Policy Development Dept of SCDC, William Byars and All Members of the Correspondence Review Committee for SCDC |
0:2013cv03309 |
November 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Rock Hill Office |
Dorchester |
Richard M Gergel |
Paige J Gossett |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice as to the federal claims. (abuc) |
Filing 35 ORDER VACATING 30 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, and ADOPTING 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Members of the Policy Development Dept of SCDC, William Byars, All Mem bers of the Correspondence Review Committee for SCDC, 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Members of the Policy Development Dept of SCDC. Plaintiff's federal claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental juri sdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) and REMANDS the remaining state law claims to Dorchester County Court of Common Pleas. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/26/2014. (abuc) Modified to edit text on 6/27/2014 (abuc). |
Filing 30 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 24 Report and Recommendation. The Court declines to adopt the R&R and denies Plaintiff's motion to remand (Dkt. No. 15). Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/3/2014. (abuc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.