Jackson v. Scott et al
| Lamar Rashad Jackson |
| Randy Scott and Investigator Montgomery |
| 0:2014cv01066 |
| March 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
AMENDED JUDGMENT dismissing the case. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT dismissing the case. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to enter default against Defendant Montgomery. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, shall file a properly supported motion for def ault judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) or otherwise indicate how he would like to proceed. If the plaintiff fails to file the motion or to take other action to advance this matter, the court shall recommend that this action be dismissed. (Response to Order due by 9/9/2014.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 8/26/2014. (gmil) Modified to edit docket text on 8/27/2014 (gmil).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. It is ordered that the complaint be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to Defendant Randy Scott. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 6/3/2014.(abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
