Massey v. Branham et al
| John K Massey, Jr |
| J T Branham and County of York |
| 0:2014cv01876 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| York |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER adopting 134 Report and Recommendation; granting Defendants' 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 2/27/2017. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER denying 83 MOTION to Amend/Correct; denying 84 MOTION to Compel; and denying 89 MOTION for Physical and Mental Examinations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/26/2015. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER accepting 36 Report and Recommendation, granting 45 Motion to Amend/Correct, denying 9 Motion to Remand, and granting 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges added. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 3/23/2015. Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(mwal)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 33 Motion to Produce; denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 10 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena; denying 12 Motion for Discovery; denying 17 Motion to Produce; denying 22 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena; denying 22 Motion to Produce. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 10/27/2014.(abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
