Henderson v. Group 1 Automotive Inc
Plaintiff: Arthur Wyman Henderson
Defendant: Group 1 Automotive Inc
Case Number: 0:2014cv02639
Filed: June 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Rock Hill Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff is directed to provide responses to the discovery request by December 15, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 12/1/2014.(mwal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Group 1 Automotive Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Group 1 Automotive Inc
Represented By: George Alfred Reeves, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Wyman Henderson
Represented By: James Lewis Cromer
Represented By: Julius Wistar Babb, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?