Daly v. SunTrust Mortgage Inc et al
Loreen Daly |
SunTrust Mortgage Inc, Krista M. McGuire, Suntrust Banks Inc, Suntrust Bank and Parker Poe |
SunTrust Mortgage Inc |
Loreen Daly |
0:2015cv01930 |
May 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Rock Hill Office |
York |
Shiva V Hodges |
Mary G Lewis |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1691 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER granting SunTrust's 51 MOTION to Amend/Correct 12 Answer to Complaint and granting SunTrust's 54 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/23/2016. (mwal) |
Filing 47 ORDER adopting 35 Report and Recommendation; denying as moot 4 Motion for Complex Case Designation; granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 15 Motion to A mend/Correct; denying 16 Motion to Remand to State Court; and granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Further, Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is dismissed because it is not an independent cause of action. Krista M. McGuire, Parker Poe, Suntrust Bank, Suntrust Banks Inc, Krista M. McGuire (Esq) and Parker Poe terminated. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/29/2016. (mwal) |
Filing 29 ORDER directing Plaintiff to file her responses to Special Interrogatories by September 29, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 9/15/2015. (mwal) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.