Harley v. Stirling et al
| Thomas Harley |
| Bryant Stirling, Anthony Padula, Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Stephen Claytar, Curtis Earley, Kathrine Burgess, Amy Enloe, Jennifer Dean, Micheal Matthews, Felicia Ogunsile, Ryan McCall, James Gardner, Ashley Goodwine, Wantonya Goldtein, Megan Tort, Gregory Barnes and Rhonda Abston |
| 0:2015cv02648 |
| July 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Greenville |
| Paige J Gossett |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER adopting the 52 Report and Recommendation and dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants' 28 motion for summary judgment is denied as moot. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 4/28/2016. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 9 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Thomas Harley. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 11/3/2015. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER directing Plaintiff to always keep the Clerk of Court advised in writing (901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201) if your address changes for any reason. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 7/20/2015. (gmil)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
