Hanna v. Huddle House et al
| Lavonne Monique Hanna |
| Huddle House and John Susigan |
| 0:2016cv00752 |
| March 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| York |
| Kaymani D West |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 47 Report and Recommendation, and finding as moot 30 Motion to Dismiss, filed by John Susigan, Huddle House. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 1/19/17. (mflo, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: No later than December 14, 2016, Plaintiff must advise the court in writing whether she wishes to continue with this case, and, if so, she must also file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30 ) no later than December 14, 2016.This new deadline for response will have given Plaintiff a total of 21 weeks to file a response to Defendants' Motion. Based on this lenient extension period and the court's need to res olve cases in a timely manner, Plaintiff is advised that no further extensions of the response deadline will be given. Plaintiff is further advised that if she fails to respond, it will be recommended that her Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 11/30/2016. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
