Surdak et al v. Black et al
| Donald Robert Surdak |
| Gerald Black, Tilie Kilgore, Chad McBride, Gary M. Bryant and Arlette Jones |
| 0:2017cv00796 |
| March 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Anderson |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER adopting the 11 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M. Cain on 6/8/2017. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER directing that this action shall pertain only to Plaintiff Donald Robert Surdak and the other listed plaintiffs, Joshua Ray Patrick and Charles Allen Tripp shall be terminated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Co urt shall mail a copy of this order and a standard pro se prisoner complaint form to Charles Allen Tripp, assign a separate civil action number to Plaintiff Joshua Ray Patrick, docket this order as the initial entry in the newly created case, and re-file the 1 Complaint in the newly created action, which shall have the same defendants listed in the instant action. Signed by Honorable Timothy M. Cain on 4/12/2017. (bgoo) Modified to edit text on 4/12/2017. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
