Jacobs v. Maultrie et al
| Dennis Jacobs |
| Lt. Maultrie, Lashonda Murphy, Sgt. Mack and Officer Suggs |
| 0:2017cv02453 |
| September 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Rock Hill Office |
| Marlboro |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER dismissing this case with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The 29 Report and Recommendation and all pending 29 motions are rendered moot. Signed by Honorable A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr. on 7/16/2018. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER directing each legal representative entering an appearance in this matter on behalf of any defendant to complete a Defendant's Certification and file it with the court within seven (7) days from the date of this ord er. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party disagrees with the court's construction of the Plaintiff's claims, he or she may file an appropriate motion with the court within seven (7) days from the date of this order. (Defendant's Certification due by 12/22/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 12/15/2017. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
