Smyth v. State S.C.

Petitioner: Keith Adger Smyth
Respondent: State S.C.
Case Number: 0:2018cv01390
Filed: May 22, 2018
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Rock Hill Office
County: Spartanburg
Referring Judge: Paige J Gossett
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 12, 2018 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing Petitioner to submit an addendum to his Amended Petition that lists the grounds that would show he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or law or treaties of the United States within fourteen days of the date of this order. (Addendum to Amended Petition due by 10/26/2018.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 10/12/2018. (bgoo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smyth v. State S.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith Adger Smyth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State S.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?