Tong v. Johnson et al
| Chenglong Tong |
| Jeh Johnson, Denise Frazier and Jaclyn Williams |
| 0:2018cv02395 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chenglong Tong. Denise Frazier served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018; Jeh Johnson served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018; Jaclyn Williams served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Cover Page) (bgoo) |
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, #6 Order Service, and #7 Summons Issued placed in U.S. Mail to Chenglong Tong. (bgoo) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Denise Frazier, Jeh Johnson, Jaclyn Williams. Service due by 12/11/2018 (bgoo) |
Filing 6
ORDER authorizing issuance of summons by clerk, advising petitioner of the responsibility for service of process, and directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/12/2018. (bgoo)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Chenglong Tong. (Filing fee $400.00. Receipt number SCX300077914.) (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (bgoo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
