Lattimore v. Group Delphi, Inc.
| Katelyn Lattimore |
| Group Delphi, Inc. |
| 0:2018cv03284 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/28/19. (vhor)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Report due by 3/5/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/25/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/28/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/24/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/24/2019, Discovery due by 8/23/2019, Motions due by 9/9/2019, ADR Statement due by 10/7/2019, Mediation Due by 11/6/2019, Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/28/2019. (lbak)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Christopher Robert Strianese ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8233236) by Katelyn Lattimore. Response to Motion due by 2/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(Modla, Jacob) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tamara Lynn Huckert ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8233211) by Katelyn Lattimore. Response to Motion due by 2/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)No proposed order.Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(Modla, Jacob) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/28/2019 and Additional attachment(s) added on 1/28/2019: #2 Certificate of Good Standing to correct scan of documents.) (lbak) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Group Delphi, Inc..(Adams, Julie) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER DEFENSES ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Group Delphi, Inc..(Adams, Julie) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Group Delphi, Inc.. (lbak) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Katelyn Lattimore. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Group Delphi, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8145682.), filed by Katelyn Lattimore. Service due by 3/6/2019 (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lattimore v. Group Delphi, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katelyn Lattimore | |
| Represented By: | Jacob John Modla |
| Represented By: | Tamara Lynn Huckert |
| Represented By: | Christopher Robert Strianese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Group Delphi, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Julie Kerr Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
