C. et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
Laquinta S. Bouknight, D. C. and D. G. |
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Kermisha Golden, Sani Hall and Casandra Barber |
0:2020cv02250 |
June 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James Tyler Burns on behalf of Laquinta S. Bouknight, D. C., D. G. (Burns, James) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Casandra Barber, Kermisha Golden, Sani Hall, South Carolina Department of Social Services re #4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories, 3 Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 MOTION to Dismiss (cbru, ) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Casandra Barber, Kermisha Golden, Sani Hall, South Carolina Department of Social Services.(cbru, ) |
Filing 2 *Originally filed in state court* MOTION to Dismiss by South Carolina Department of Social Services. No proposed order.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fairfield County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-20-00094 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9156943) filed by Casandra Barber, South Carolina Department of Social Services, Kermisha Golden, Sani Hall. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Affidavit of William H. Davidson, II)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.