Healy v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
| Sonya T. Healy |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The and Aetna Life Insurance Company |
| 0:2021cv00023 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Aetna Life Insurance Company.(Hawk, John) |
| Filing 15 TEXT ORDER: On February 2, 2021, the Clerk reminded Defendant that "Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears". The Clerk requested that Defendant "file these answers to interrogatories no later than February 16, 2021". Nevertheless, the deadline has passed and Defendant has failed to do so. Therefore, not later than the close of business on February 18, 2021, the Court directs Defendant to file said answers. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Answer to LR26.01 Interrogatories due by 2/18/2021) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/17/2021. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 SPECIALIZED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/2/2021. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE: Defendant is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than February 16, 2021. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Aetna Life Insurance Company.(Hawk, John) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Joint MOTION to Substitute Party. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/28/2021. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Substitute Party by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The. Response to Motion due by 2/11/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Hawk, John) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sonya T. Healy.(Dunn, Geoff) |
| Filing 7 REPLY by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The . (Hawk, John) |
| Filing 6 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The answer due 2/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Email Confirming Extension)(Hawk, John) Modified to edit text on 1/6/2021 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 1/13/2021) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/6/2021. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from York County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-46-03488 (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9566912) filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons and Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - DOI Letter)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
