Cantero v. Knight et al
Diego Armando Cantero |
M. Kimberley, C. Werts, R. Capers, R. Bell, Ms. Boatwright, Stevie Knight and M. Forsyth |
0:2021cv00457 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Paige J Gossett |
Margaret B Seymour |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #9 Order and #10 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Diego Armando Cantero 69201-019 FPC Estill PO Box 699 Estill, SC 29918. (mmcd) |
Filing 10 JUDGMENT dismissing the case without prejudice. (mmcd) |
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Margaret B. Seymour on 4/9/2021. (mmcd) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #5 Proper Form Order and one (1) blank AO-240 form placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Diego Armando Cantero 69201-019 FPC Estill PO Box 699 Estill, SC 29918. (mmcd) |
Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 3/23/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 3/2/2021. (mmcd) |
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Beaufort. (lbak) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Diego Armando Cantero. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.