Brado v. Lowery et al
| Adam L. Brado |
| Haverty Furniture Companies Inc and Rikheem A. Lowery |
| 0:2021cv00470 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/3/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/3/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/3/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/17/2021, Discovery due by 10/15/2021, Motion in Limine due by 12/17/2021, Motions due by 10/29/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 12/20/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 1/17/2022, Mediation Due by 11/19/2021. Signed by Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 4/5/21. (mflo, ) |
| Filing 20 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Signed by Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 4/5/21. (mflo, ) |
| Filing 19 Defendants' Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Haverty Furniture Companies Inc.(Shakibanasab, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 ADR STATEMENT/CERTIFICATION for Defendants by Haverty Furniture Companies Inc(Shakibanasab, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 Defendant's Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Haverty Furniture Companies Inc.(Shakibanasab, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Adam L. Brado.(Peace, John) |
| Filing 14 Rule 26(f) Report by Adam L. Brado. Modified on 4/2/2021 to remove attached proposed orders and remove text relating to same(ahil). |
| Filing 13 Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Adam L. Brado.(Peace, John) (Main Document 13 replaced on 4/2/2021 with document provided by the filer (ahil). |
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Mediation by Adam L. Brado(Peace, John) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Adam L. Brado.(Peace, John) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John R Peace on behalf of Adam L. Brado (Peace, John) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Haverty Furniture Companies Inc.(Shakibanasab, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 Defendant Lowery's ANSWER to Complaint by Rikheem A. Lowery.(Shakibanasab, Joseph) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/8/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 4/2/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/3/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/27/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/28/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 7/16/2021, Discovery due by 8/16/2021, Motion in Limine due by 10/14/2021, Motions due by 8/30/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 10/25/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 11/15/2021, Mediation Due by 9/13/2021, Signed by Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on Febraury 16, 2021. (ahil)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rikheem A. Lowery Certificate of Service (Shakibanasab, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Rikheem A. Lowery.(ahil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lancaster Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-29-01453. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9648920), filed by Rikheem A. Lowery. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Affidavit of Service of Rikheem A. Lowery, #3 Exhibit C State Court Record)CLERK's Note: State Court record includes Answer of Defendant Haverty Furniture Company, Inc. dated January 4, 2021.(ahil) (Main Document 1 replaced in error and corrected on 2/17/2021) (ahil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
