Coleman et al v. Britax Child Safety, Inc.
Tiffany Coleman and Keli Swann |
Britax Child Safety, Inc. |
0:2021cv00721 |
March 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Sherri A Lydon |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Britax Child Safety, Inc.'s deadline to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to June 7, 2021. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on May 7, 2021.(ahil) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Britax Child Safety, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 5/21/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Hall, Kevin) |
Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Britax Child Safety, Inc..(Hall, Kevin) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Britax Child Safety, Inc. (ahil) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tiffany Coleman, Keli Swann.(ahil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Britax Child Safety, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9705714.), filed by Tiffany Coleman, Keli Swann. Service due by 6/10/2021.(ahil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.