Gaston v. McGill et al
| Adreal Neco Gaston |
| Charles Eugene McGill, Jr., John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 5, John/Jane Doe 4, P&S Transportation, LLC, John/Jane Doe 3, John/Jane Doe 2 and DT Freight, LLC |
| 0:2021cv01393 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Adreal Neco Gaston.(Corrigan, Kevin) |
| Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/28/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/22/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/22/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/13/2021, Discovery due by 1/10/2022, Motion in Limine due by 3/11/2022, Motions due by 1/24/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 3/21/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 4/11/2022, Mediation Due by 2/7/2022, Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on June 11, 2021. (ahil) |
| Filing 14 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by DT Freight, LLC, Charles Eugene McGill, Jr, P&S Transportation, LLC.(Chase, Gerald) |
| Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by DT Freight, LLC, Charles Eugene McGill, Jr, P&S Transportation, LLC, and Adreal Neco Gaston. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Consent Amended Scheduling Order)(Chase, Gerald) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to DT Freight, LLC. (ahil) |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Adreal Neco Gaston.(Corrigan, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Adreal Neco Gaston. Service due by 8/26/2021 (Corrigan, Kevin) (Main Document 9 replaced on 5/28/2021 to remove the Summons from the main document) (ahil). |
| Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/3/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 6/17/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/28/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/23/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/21/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 10/12/2021, Discovery due by 11/10/2021, Motion in Limine due by 1/10/2022, Motions due by 11/24/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 1/18/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 2/8/2022, Mediation Due by 12/8/2021, Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on May 14, 2021. (ahil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Charles Corrigan on behalf of Adreal Neco Gaston (Corrigan, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Charles Eugene McGill, Jr, P&S Transportation, LLC.(Chase, Gerald) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Daniel Moseley, Jr on behalf of Charles Eugene McGill, Jr, P&S Transportation, LLC (Moseley, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for York County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Acknowledgement by State Clerk)(Chase, Gerald) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charles Eugene McGill, Jr, P&S Transportation, LLC.(ahil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from York County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-46-1142. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9833305), filed by Charles Eugene McGill, Jr, and P&S Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents York County Court of Common Pleas, 2021-cv-46-1142)(ahil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
