Jackson et al v. Smith
| Tracy L. Jackson, Jackie Gainey-Jackson and Damion Gainey |
| Larry Allen Smith |
| 0:2022cv00209 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Larry Allen Smith.Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/21/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Oates, Jesse) |
| Filing 19 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 16. Reason: Attorney refiled instead of submitting corrected document via email as directed. Corrected Filing Document Number #17 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: N/A - Correction made on same date as original filing. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A - Correction made on same date as original filing. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 18 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tracy L. Jackson, Jackie Gainey-Jackson, Damion Gainey.(Manzi, David) Modified to add filers listed on document on 2/28/2022 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Tracy L. Jackson, Jackie Gainey-Jackson, Damion Gainey. Response to Motion due by 3/14/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Offer of Judgment, #2 Exhibit 2 - Email Correspondence)No proposed order.(Manzi, David) Modified to add filers listed on document, to correct motion relief, and to edit text on 2/28/2022 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 15 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiffs failed to file Rule 26.01 Interrogatories, as required, within fourteen days of removal. The Clerk of Court, on February 7, 2022, provided Plaintiffs an additional fourteen days to file the required Rule 26.01 Interrogatories. Plaintiffs failed to file the 26.01 Interrogatories within this second fourteen day timeframe.Furthermore, Plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion to remand that had multiple deficiencies. On February 8, 2022, the Clerk of Court, via email, informed Plaintiffs of their motion's deficiencies and directed them to rectify these deficiencies by the following day. Plaintiffs failed to comply with the Clerk of Court's directive. The Clerk of Court, via email, on February 10, 2022, provided Plaintiffs an additional day to correct their motion's deficiencies, but they again failed to comply with the Clerk of Court's directive. On February 16, 2022, the Court, in a Text Order, directed Plaintiffs to rectify their motion's deficiencies by the following day. Plaintiffs ignored this Order. The Court, in a February 18, 2022, Text Order, directed Plaintiffs to rectify their motion's deficiencies no later than February 22, 2022. Plaintiffs ignored this Order, too.Plaintiffs are directed, no later than February 25, 2022, to show cause as to why their case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Furthermore, Plaintiffs are directed to show cause, no later than February 25, 2022, why they should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with this Court's orders. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Show Cause Response due by 2/25/2022) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/23/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 9. Reason: Per Order #13. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: The Clerk is hereby directed to delete docket entry number 9 due to counsel's failure to correct filing deficiencies in the entry despite multiple directives from both the Clerk's Office and the Court to do so. Plaintiffs shall file a fully corrected version of their Motion to Remand no later than Tuesday, February 22, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Corrected Motion due by 2/22/2022) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/18/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiffs' counsel has failed to comply with instructions from the Clerk's office to correct filing deficiencies in Dkt. No. 9 . These deficiencies shall be corrected no later than February 17, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Docket Correction due by 2/17/2022) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/16/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 10 Deficiency Notification (Prior notifications sent via e-mail) In Re Document Number:9. Docket Correction due 2/15/2022. Any response due is based on the filing date of the original document. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiffs are reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the notice of removal. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than February 22, 2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 6 REPLY by Larry Allen Smith . (Oates, Jesse) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 1/28/2022) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/21/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Larry Allen Smith.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-29-00495 (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10292005) filed by Larry Allen Smith. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
