Aguero Alvarado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
| Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado and Fausto Alejandro Aguero-Alverado |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, FCI Estill, SC, William E. Mackelburg, FNU Crickard, FNU Frazer, USP Lewisburg, PA, FNU Spaulding, John Doe, FCI Bennettsville and FNU Warren |
| Alan McCrory Wilson |
| 0:2022cv01723 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MOTION to Quash Summons by Alan McCrory Wilson. Response to Motion due by 8/4/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Leggett, Leon)
|
|
Filing 16
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service due by 10/3/2022. (dist)
|
|
Filing 15
***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado, 98068-004, FCI Bennettsville, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 52020, Bennettsville, SC 29512. (dist)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 7/1/2022. (dist)
|
|
Filing 10
***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order, 9 Clerk's Notice, previously submitted Summons and USM forms, 2 blank USM forms mailed from Columbia Clerks Office to Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado, 98068-004, FCI Bennettsville, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 52020, Bennettsville, SC 29512. (dist)
|
|
Filing 9
Clerk's Notice: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel addressed in #8 . (dist)
|
|
Filing 8
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 7/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/16/2022. (dist)
|
|
Filing 5
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dist)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado. Response to Motion due by 6/16/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope 1, #4 Envelope 2)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (dist)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado. Response to Motion due by 6/16/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope 1, #3 Envelope 2)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet 1, #2 Cover Sheet 2, #3 Supporting Documents, #4 Envelope 1, #5 Envelope 2) (dist)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
