Shackleford v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Burnett T Shackleford |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
| 0:2022cv03929 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| David C Norton |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 11 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Ashish Anand Agrawal Chermol & Fishman, LLC 11450 Bustleton Avenue Philadelphia PA 19116-2809 (asni, ) |
| Filing 11 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting without opposition #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 12/6/2022. (kkus, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ashish Agrawal ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10830569) by Burnett T Shackleford. Response to Motion due by 12/19/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ashish Agrawal, #2 Exhibit A Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(McChesney, Paul) |
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by Burnett T Shackleford. (McChesney, Paul) |
| Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting without opposition and for good cause shown #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 12/5/2022. (kkus, ) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to file the Certified Administrative Record by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Response to Motion due by 12/15/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Fritts, Heather) |
| Filing 6 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 11/18/2022. (kkus, ) |
| Filing 5 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.02, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 3/8/2023 (asni, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Burnett T Shackleford. Response to Motion due by 11/21/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(asni, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Burnett T Shackleford.(asni, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
