Branham v. Stirling et al
| George S. Branham, II |
| Bryan Stirling and Shane Jackson |
| 0:2023cv00745 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Return by Shane Jackson, Bryan Stirling. Response to Motion due by 5/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Brown, Melody) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Shane Jackson, Bryan Stirling. (Brown, Melody) |
Filing 6
ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due by 4/26/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 3/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition)(dist)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by George S. Branham, II re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Amended) (Grose, Ernest) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number ASCDC-10961117 (dist) |
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (dist) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by George S. Branham, II.(dist) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
