Gaddy v. State of South Carolina et al
Calvin L Gaddy and Calvin Lyndale Gaddy |
State of South Carolina, Attorney General, US State Magistrate Judge, Sheriff Barry S Faile, Lancaster County Clerk of Court and Esquire Attorney General |
0:2023cv01263 |
March 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph F Anderson |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Calvin L Gaddy. Reply to Objections due by 5/1/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Memo of Law, #3 Second Memo of Law, #4 Report and Recommendation, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order, #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Calvin L Gaddy placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Calvin L Gaddy #323551 Manning Correctional Institution 502 Beckman Rd Columbia, SC 29203 (rweb, ) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; It is recommended that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis Doc. #2 be DENIED. It is further recommended that Plaintiff be given twenty-one (21) days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation to pay the filing fee of four hundred dollars ($402) and that the Clerk of Court withhold entry of judgment until such time for payment expires. If Plaintiff timely pays the filing fee, this action should be sent to the undersigned for further initial review. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within the specified time period, it is further recommended that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice under the three- strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and that the Clerk of Court enter the required final judgment at the close of the twenty-one day period permitted for payment of the filing fee. Objections to R&R due by 4/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 4/3/23. (rweb, ) |
Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER; Case to be brought into proper form by 4/24/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 4/3/23. (rweb, ) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT by Calvin L Gaddy to #1 Complaint,. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (rweb, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Calvin L Gaddy. Response to Motion due by 4/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(rweb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Attorney General, Esquire Attorney General, Barry S Faile, Lancaster County Clerk of Court, State of South Carolina, US State Magistrate Judge, filed by Calvin L Gaddy. Service due by 6/28/2023 (Attachments: #1 Declareraction Non Frivolous, #2 Non Frivolous Faces of Law, #3 Appendix, #4 Envelope)(rweb, ) Modified on 4/3/2023 see #6 for additional attachments (rweb, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.