Adams v. SC Department of
| George Adams and George M. Adams |
| SC Department of |
| 0:2023cv01722 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| David C Norton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #17 Order on Report and Recommendation, #18 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to George Adams, 181283, Allendale Correctional Institution,Post Office Box 1151,Hwy 47, Fairfax, SC 29827. (dist) |
| Filing 18 JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (dist) |
Filing 17
ORDER affirming #13 Report and Recommendation, dismissing case without prejudice and without requiring respondent to file a return. It is also ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 6/12/2023.(eric, )
|
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #11 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to George Adams, 181283, Allendale Correctional Institution, Post Office Box 1151, Hwy 47 Fairfax, SC 29827. (dist) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the instant #1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file a return. Objections to R&R due by 5/30/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/16/2023. (dist) |
| Filing 12 Clerk's Notice: #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #11 . (dist) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition)(dist) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/17/2023 with corrected scan of document) (dist).
|
| Filing 10 Additional Attachments to Main Document #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access). First attachment description: Copy of Order previously mailed to Petitioner. (dist) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by George Adams. Response to Motion due by 5/30/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) Additional attachment added on 5/16/2023 at #10 . (dist). |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, IFP Application placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to George Adams, 181283, Allendale Correctional Institution, Post Office Box 1151, Hwy 47, Fairfax, SC 29827. (dist) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 5/24/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/3/2023. (dist)
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Aiken. (dist) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by George Adams. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(dist) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
