Hart v. Rock Hill Police Department et al
| Jerome Hart, Jerome Hart,, Jerome V Hart and Jerome Vernard Hart |
| Rock Hill Police Department, Officer Bryan Hicks and Officer Prinz |
| 0:2023cv02243 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1986 Neglect of Duty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #3 Proper Form Order, a copy of ECF No. 1 (pages 1 and 2), a complaint form (Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner Complaint), a Form AO-240, a summons form, and three Forms USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Jerome Hart 37657 York County Detention Center 1675- 3A York Highway York, SC 29745. (dgar) |
Filing 3
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 8/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 7/12/2023. (dgar) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/12/2023) (dgar, ).
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Officer Bryan Hicks, Officer Prinz, Rock Hill Police Department, filed by Jerome Hart. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(apsn) Modified on 7/12/2023 to edit docket text(dgar). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
