Jackson v. Five Below, Inc.
| India Lashaw Jackson |
| Five Below, Inc. |
| 0:2023cv04104 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/30/2024, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 2/26/2024, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/26/2024, Discovery due by 5/14/2024, Motions due by 5/28/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 7/22/2024, case to be called for trial during the October 2024 term of court, and Mediation Due by 6/11/2024. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on September 27, 2023. (ahil) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by India Lashaw Jackson.(Richey, Lola) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Five Below, Inc..(Highfield, Duke) |
| Filing 7 Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Five Below, Inc. (Highfield, Duke) (Main Document 7 replaced on 9/26/2023 with document provided by filer.) (ahil). |
| Filing 6 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Five Below, Inc. (Highfield, Duke) Modified on 9/21/2023 to remove attachment so as to be in compliance with judicial filing preferences (ahil). (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/22/2023 with document provided by filer.) (ahil) (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/27/2023 with document provided by filer.) (ahil) |
| Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 9/7/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 9/21/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/1/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 11/27/2023, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/27/2023, Discovery due by 2/14/2024, Motions due by 2/28/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 4/23/2024, case to be called during the June 2024 term of court, and Mediation Due by 3/13/2024. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on August 18, 2023. (ahil) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Five Below, Inc. (ahil) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Five Below, Inc..(ahil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from York County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-46-2255. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CSCDC-11273652), filed by Five Below, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(ahil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Five Below, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: India Lashaw Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Lola S Richey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Five Below, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Chelsea Nicole Frye |
| Represented By: | Duke Raleigh Highfield |
| Represented By: | Victoria Leigh Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
