Bradley v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Plaintiff: Tamya L. Bradley
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Case Number: 0:2023cv04603
Filed: September 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Referring Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2023 Filing 12 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER:Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/9/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/4/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/5/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/21/2024, Discovery due by 5/24/2024, Motions due by 6/7/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 8/2/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 9/3/2024, Mediation Due by 6/21/2024, Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on November 2, 2023. (kbos)
October 30, 2023 Filing 11 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Tamya L. Bradley.(Maxfield, Dave)
October 30, 2023 Filing 10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Tamya L. Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Amended Scheduling Order)(Maxfield, Dave)
October 30, 2023 Filing 9 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.(Wyman, Jason)
September 29, 2023 Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Terry L Wooten. Judge Honorable Sherri A Lydon no longer assigned to the case. (cwil, )
September 26, 2023 Filing 7 CONFERENCE and SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/16/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 10/30/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/11/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 1/4/2024, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/5/2024, Discovery due by 3/25/2024, Motions due by 4/8/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/3/2024, case to be called during the July 2024 term of court, and Mediation Due by 4/22/2024. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on September 26, 2023. (ahil)
September 25, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.(Wyman, Jason)
September 14, 2023 Filing 5 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Wells Fargo Bank, NA answer due 9/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E-mail Confirming Extension)(Wyman, Jason)
September 13, 2023 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tamya L. Bradley.(Maxfield, Dave)
September 13, 2023 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wells Fargo Bank, NA.(ahil)
September 13, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from York County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-46-02476. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11316185), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents York County Court of Common Pleas; 2023-CP-46-02476)(ahil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamya L. Bradley
Represented By: Dave Maxfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Represented By: Jason David Wyman
Represented By: Shelton Sterling Laney, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?