Nataren v. United States of America, The et al
Plaintiff: Gloria Nataren
Defendant: United States of America, The and Amisub of South Carolina doing business as Piedmont Medical Center
Case Number: 0:2023cv05112
Filed: October 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2023 Filing 13 AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 2/16/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/15/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/12/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/13/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/13/2024, Discovery due by 7/12/2024, Motion in Limine due by 10/25/2024, Motions due by 7/26/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 10/11/2024, Bench Trial Deadline 11/15/2024, Mediation Due by 9/24/2024. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/27/2023. (cbru, )
November 27, 2023 Filing 12 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct #8 Scheduling Order,, by United States of America, The. Response to Motion due by 12/11/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Proposed Amended Scheduling Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Newman, Christie)
November 27, 2023 Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: Defendant The United States of America's #10 Motion to Amend/Correct is dismissed without prejudice to refiling for failure to comply with subsections (2) and (3) of Local Civil Rule 6.01. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/27/2023.(cbru, )
November 22, 2023 Filing 10 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct #8 Scheduling Order,, by United States of America, The. Response to Motion due by 12/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Proposed Amended Scheduling Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Newman, Christie)
November 14, 2023 Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/14/2023. (cbru, )
November 14, 2023 Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 12/18/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/16/2024, Plaintiff ID of Expert Witness due by 2/12/2024, Defendant ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/13/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 3/13/2024, Discovery due by 5/13/2024, Motion in Limine due by 8/26/2024, Motions due by 5/27/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 8/12/2024, Bench Trial Deadline 9/16/2024, Mediation Due by 7/26/2024. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/14/2023. (cbru, )
November 14, 2023 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Amisub of South Carolina.(Farr, Chance)
November 14, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Amisub of South Carolina.(Farr, Chance) Modified to edit entry linkage on 11/14/2023 (cbru, ).
November 14, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Chance Michael Farr on behalf of Amisub of South Carolina (Farr, Chance) (Main Document 5 replaced on 11/14/2023) (cbru, ).
October 13, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America, The. (U.S. Attorney) (Attachments: #1 U.S. Attorney General)(cbru, )
October 12, 2023 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Gloria Nataren.(cbru, )
October 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amisub of South Carolina, United States of America, The (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11371042) filed by Gloria Nataren. Service due by 1/10/2024 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Intent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Dr. Hawkins, #3 Exhibit 3 - Affidavit of Service of NOI, #4 Exhibit 4 - Affidavit of Service of NOI, #5 Exhibit 5 - Proof of ADR Conference, #6 Exhibit 6 - Amended Affidavit of Dr. Hawkins, #7 Exhibit 7 - Standard Form 95, #8 Exhibit 8 - Email Submitting Standard Form 95, #9 Exhibit 9 - Acknowledgement of Administrative Claim, #10 Exhibit 10 - Submission of Supplemental Materials to DHHS)(cbru, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nataren v. United States of America, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gloria Nataren
Represented By: Perry McPherson Buckner, IV
Represented By: William E Applegate, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America, The
Represented By: Christie V Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amisub of South Carolina doing business as Piedmont Medical Center
Represented By: Chance Michael Farr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?