Bauman v. Jones-Hamilton Co
Allen Bauman |
Jones-Hamilton Co |
0:2023cv05825 |
November 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Sherri A Lydon |
Kaymani D West |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 1/25/2024, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 2/20/2024, Rule 26 Report due by 2/8/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/20/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/15/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/14/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/3/2024, Discovery due by 7/3/2024, Motion in Limine due by 9/3/2024, Motions due by 7/17/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/10/2024, Mediation Due by 7/31/2024. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs 7 days prior to the date set for jury selection. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and/or trial on or after October 1, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 1/5/2024. (prou, ) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jones-Hamilton Co.(Tisdale, Homer) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have up to and including January 5, 2024, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 12/6/2023.(prou, ) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jones-Hamilton Co.(Tisdale, Homer) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Jones-Hamilton Co. Response to Motion due by 12/19/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(Tisdale, Homer) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allen Bauman. Jones-Hamilton Co served on 11/17/2023, answer due 12/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (Modla, Jacob); Modified on 11/27/2023 to correct event type.(prou, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jones-Hamilton Co. (prou, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Allen Bauman.(prou, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jones-Hamilton Co ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11427779.), filed by Allen Bauman. Service due by 2/12/2024.(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bauman v. Jones-Hamilton Co | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Allen Bauman | |
Represented By: | Jacob John Modla |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jones-Hamilton Co | |
Represented By: | Homer Bernard Tisdale, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.