Lafferty et al v. Anthony
| James Lafferty, Karen Lafferty and Karen Laffery |
| Shaun D. Anthony |
| 0:2024cv00169 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Shaun D. Anthony.(Florence, Phillip) |
| Filing 23 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by James Lafferty, Karen Laffery.(West, Edgar) Modified to edit filers and text on 2/27/2024 (cbru, ). (Main Document 23 replaced on 2/27/2024) (cbru, ). |
| Filing 22 TEXT ORDER: The parties have failed to comply with the Conference and Scheduling Order (Dkt No. #10 ) by failing to file a Rule 26(f) Report "in the form attached to th(e) order" by February 20, 2024. Additionally, Plaintiffs have failed to file Responses to Local Rule 26.03 Interrogatories in conjunction with the Rule 26(f) Report by that same date. Counsel has also failed to comply with instructions from the Clerk's office to correct these deficiencies. Therefore, counsel is directed to file the required report and responses to interrogatories no later than February 28, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Rule 26 Report due by 2/28/2024, LR 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories due by 2/28/2024) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/27/2024. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 21 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Shaun D. Anthony.(Florence, Phillip) |
| Filing 20 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 18. Reason: Multiple deficiencies. Corrected Filing Document Number #19 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: 2/20/2024. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 19 Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Shaun D. Anthony, James Lafferty, Karen Laffery.(Florence, Phillip) Modified to edit filers and filing date on 2/22/2024 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 17 Amended Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by James Lafferty, Karen Laffery.(West, Edgar) Modified to edit text and filers on 2/9/2024 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 16 TEXT ORDER: On January 25, 2024, the Clerk reminded Plaintiffs that "Local Rule 26.01 includes Interrogatory H to be answered in any action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)." The Clerk requested that Plaintiffs "file an answer to this interrogatory no later than February 8, 2024." Nevertheless, the deadline has passed and Plaintiffs have failed to do so. Therefore, not later than the close of business on February 12, 2024, the Court directs Plaintiffs to file said answer. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Answer to LR26.01 Interrogatories due by 2/12/2024) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/9/2024. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiffs are reminded that Local Rule 26.01 includes Interrogatory H to be answered in any action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). Please file an answer to this interrogatory no later than February 8, 2024. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by James Lafferty, Karen Laffery.(West, Edgar) Modified to edit text and filers on 1/25/2024 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 12 REPLY by Shaun D. Anthony to Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis. (Florence, Phillip) |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/16/2024. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 10 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 2/20/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/18/2024, Plaintiff ID of Expert Witness due by 4/15/2024, Defendant ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/15/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/15/2024, Discovery due by 7/15/2024, Motion in Limine due by 10/28/2024, Motions due by 7/29/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 10/15/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 11/18/2024, Mediation Due by 9/27/2024. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/16/2024. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 9 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 6. Reason: Attachments within main document. Corrected Filing Document Number #8 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: 1/15/2024. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Shaun D. Anthony.(Florence, Phillip) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Chester County. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement of Notice of Removal by State Court, #2 Notice of Removal, #3 State Court Documents)(Florence, Phillip) Modified to edit filing date and text on 1/16/2024 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at http://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 1/18/2024) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/11/2024. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Shaun D. Anthony.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Chester County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-12-00637 (Filing fee $405 receipt number ASCDC-11521307), filed by Shaun D. Anthony. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
