Forbes v. Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent et al
| David Forbes |
| Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent, Unknown Board Members, A.S.G.D.C. Board of Directors, City of Columbia, Richland County, City Counsel Members, John Mark Dial, John Harvey, Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent., A.S.G.D.C., Leonardo Brown, Crayman Harvey, Dr. Shaffer and Mr. Pamper |
| 0:2024cv01054 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #22 Proper Form Order, 23 Clerk's Notice, one summons form, one USM form placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to David Forbes 602525 Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center (A.S.G.D.C.) 201 John Mark Dial Dr. Columbia, SC 29209. (apsn) |
| Filing 23 Clerk's Notice: #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel, Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; #17 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #22 Order. (apsn) |
|
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by David Forbes. Response to Motion due by 4/22/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(apsn) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against A.S.G.D.C., Leonardo Brown, Crayman Harvey, Dr. Shaffer, Mr. Pamper, filed by David Forbes. Service due by 7/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(apsn) |
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 12 Text Order on Motion for Extension of Time, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to David Forbes, 602525, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center (A.S.G.D.C.), 201 John Mark Dial Dr., Columbia, SC 29209. (lbak) |
| Filing 12 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting for good cause shown #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's deadline in which to respond to the court's orders (ECF Nos. 7 & 8) is extended until April 23, 2024. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 4/5/2024. (kkus, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time by David Forbes. Response to Motion due by 4/17/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(apsn) |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Proper Form Order, #8 Order, standard complaint form, Form A0 240, one summons form, eight USM forms placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to David Forbes 602525 Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center (A.S.G.D.C.) 201 John Mark Dial Dr. Columbia, SC 29209. (apsn) |
|
|
|
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (apsn) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by David Forbes. (Response to Motion due by 3/15/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) by David Forbes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(apsn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A.S.G.D.C. Board of Directors, Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent, City Counsel Members, City of Columbia, John Harvey, John Mark Dial, Richland County, Unknown Board Members, filed by David Forbes. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(apsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.