Jones v. Jones
Plaintiff: Barbara Latrail Jones
Defendant: Barbara Jones
Case Number: 0:2024cv01960
Filed: April 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to complete #7 Proper Form documents, filed by by Barbara Latrail Jones. Response to Motion due by 6/28/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (cpri)
May 24, 2024 Filing 9 UNREDACTED DOCUMENT: re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpri)
May 24, 2024 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Proper Form Order, 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, One standard Complaint form, One Summons, One USM-285 Form, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Barbara Latrail Jones at 3051 Drewsky Lane Apartment 302 Fort Mill, SC 29715. (cpri)
May 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER. Case to be brought into proper form by 6/14/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 05/24/2024. (cpri)
May 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff applied to proceed in the District Court without prepaying fees or costs. [ECF No. 3]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the court construes this application as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. A review of the motion reveals that Plaintiff should be relieved of the obligation to prepay the full filing fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to the court's right to require a payment if Plaintiff's financial condition changes, and to tax fees and costs against Plaintiff at the conclusion of this case if the court finds the case to be without merit. See Flint v. Haynes, 651 F.2d 970, 972-74 (4th Cir. 1981). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 5/23/24. (vhor)
April 16, 2024 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Barbara Latrail Jones. (lbak)
April 16, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Barbara Latrail Jones. Response to Motion due by 4/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
April 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barbara Jones, filed by Barbara Latrail Jones. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (lbak) Modified on 5/28/2024 to reference documents added on 5/24/2024 at #9 (cpri).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Latrail Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?