Taylor v. Ozmint
Plaintiff: Alex D Taylor
Defendant: Jon Ozmint
Case Number: 1:2009cv00915
Filed: April 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Dorchester
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ACCEPTED; Plaintiff's objections 44 are OVERRULED; and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 29 is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 9/16/2010. (mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Ozmint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex D Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jon Ozmint
Represented By: Andrew F Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?