Calloway v. Abston et al
| Johnny Calloway |
| Rhonda Abston, Wade Byrd and Ofc Jeffrey |
| 1:2009cv01925 |
| July 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Anderson |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, accepting 105 Report and Recommendation, denying 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Rhonda Abston, Ofc Jeffrey, Wade Byrd. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 2/8/2012. (abuc)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges Report is ACCEPTED. Furthermore, (1) Plaintiffs Motions for a Temporary Restraining Order are DENIED as MOOT 20 & 45 ; (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Default Ju dgment is DENIED 21 ; (3) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED 27 and (4) Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part 37 . Specifically, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff s claims of excessive force and conspiracy against Defendants Byrd and Jeffrey under §1983 and summary judgment is GRANTED on all other claims. Both Plaintiffs and Defendantsobjections are OVERRULED 58 & 60 . Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 9/13/2010. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
